FAQs on the exercise Separate Hooks for Separate States
There are currently no frequently asked questions associated with this exercise – that’s where you come in! You can contribute to this section by offering your own questions, answers, or clarifications on this exercise. Ask or answer a question by clicking reply () below.
If you’ve had an “aha” moment about the concepts, formatting, syntax, or anything else with this exercise, consider sharing those insights! Teaching others and answering their questions is one of the best ways to learn and stay sharp.
Join the Discussion. Help a fellow learner on their journey.
Ask or answer a question about this exercise by clicking reply () below!
You can also find further discussion and get answers to your questions over in Language Help.
Agree with a comment or answer? Like () to up-vote the contribution!
I don’t understand how we’re supposed to learn effectively when there are such basic mistakes like this. Unless I’m missing something here, the below code snippet, which is direct from the lesson’s material, isn’t even syntactically correct. Can’t even run it without refactoring to correct syntax errors.
This a very good question! I don’t know why it hasn’t gotten a reply so far.
About const, you’re right. They are constant values, so they cannot be changed… within the same scope . If you look closely, we always call the setState() function to update this value for us, right? But how is that possible then?
Well, we’ve learned in the previous lessons that React re-renders Components whenever they change. So in this case, when the Component is re-rendered it is not the same scope where const state was first defined. Actually, the next time const [state, setState] = useState(initialValue) is called this initial value will be ignored since state isn’t empty anymore. It would be something like this:
First render:
state receives the initial value
an event is triggered and the handler function calls setState
Component is then re-rendered
Second render:
state ignores the initial value, since it has been updated by setState.
state has been updated but not in the same function component scope, since the component has been re-rendered
Maybe knowing the actual implementation of useState() could clarify things even more, but I hope it is somehow clear that the key point is the scope of the function.