FAQ: Learn Trees: Javascript - Breadth-first Tree Traversal

This community-built FAQ covers the “Breadth-first Tree Traversal” exercise from the lesson “Learn Trees: Javascript”.

Paths and Courses
This exercise can be found in the following Codecademy content:

Pass the Technical Interview with JavaScript

FAQs on the exercise Breadth-first Tree Traversal

There are currently no frequently asked questions associated with this exercise – that’s where you come in! You can contribute to this section by offering your own questions, answers, or clarifications on this exercise. Ask or answer a question by clicking reply (reply) below.

If you’ve had an “aha” moment about the concepts, formatting, syntax, or anything else with this exercise, consider sharing those insights! Teaching others and answering their questions is one of the best ways to learn and stay sharp.

Join the Discussion. Help a fellow learner on their journey.

Ask or answer a question about this exercise by clicking reply (reply) below!
You can also find further discussion and get answers to your questions over in Language Help.

Agree with a comment or answer? Like (like) to up-vote the contribution!

Need broader help or resources? Head to Language Help and Tips and Resources. If you are wanting feedback or inspiration for a project, check out Projects.

Looking for motivation to keep learning? Join our wider discussions in Community

Learn more about how to use this guide.

Found a bug? Report it online, or post in Bug Reporting

Have a question about your account or billing? Reach out to our customer support team!

None of the above? Find out where to ask other questions here!

Wouldn’t the const current be better outside of the while loop as a let current?

Inside a loop, the block is exited after the current iteration and re-entered on each subsequent iteration so is technically a fresh namespace, hence we can use const inside the loop.

 > a = 10
<- 10
 > while (a > 0) {
       const b = a ** 2;
       console.log(b);
       a--;
   }
   100
   81
   64
   49
   36
   25
   16
   9
   4
   1
<- 1
  > 

The only reason to use let is if there is reassignment within the loop, and that would be the case for declaring it before the loop.

Bottom line: Don’t be fooled into thinking there is a right way and wrong way, as in black and white thinking. Keep an open mind and don’t be hobbled by unproven notions. That is the only real ‘should’ in programming.