There are currently no frequently asked questions associated with this exercise – that’s where you come in! You can contribute to this section by offering your own questions, answers, or clarifications on this exercise. Ask or answer a question by clicking reply () below.
If you’ve had an “aha” moment about the concepts, formatting, syntax, or anything else with this exercise, consider sharing those insights! Teaching others and answering their questions is one of the best ways to learn and stay sharp.
Join the Discussion. Help a fellow learner on their journey.
Ask or answer a question about this exercise by clicking reply () below!
Agree with a comment or answer? Like () to up-vote the contribution!
I’m not really sure about this. In the diagram, Shouldn’t left and right border be included in length of actual rendered width?
I’m talking about the line that indicate length of actual rendered width.
Shouldn’t the actual rendered width in the example be 240 px. Currently:
width = 198 px
left and right padding = 20px
left and right border = 1px
If the actual rendered with is the sum of the padding, border and actual width, does that not mean the actual rendered width is 240 px rather than 200 px as shown in the example?
This is a very poorly worded section to be honest.
There is zero explanation around this: The default value of this property is content-box . *This is the same box model that is affected by border thickness and padding."
Like what does that even mean, “affected by border thickness/padding”
It’s all explanation and no definition. It fails to define the problem or communicate what “dimensional issues” occur in the default the box-model. After explaining: abc… Should conclude: resulting in problem xyz. It fails to do it.
) below.
) to up-vote the contribution!