The conceit of these code challenges is that they're reflective of some of the most common questions asked in interview settings. Flaws though there may be in the industry with the interviewing and hiring process, sometimes we just have to work with things as they are, not as we'd like them to be.

# [Challenge] Top Score Sorter

**aquaphoenix17**#23

Here is my non-cheaty entry for the Basic/Hard Challenge in Python 2.7: https://repl.it/JOaW/6

First, as in my previous entry, I went ahead and stored our test values.

Next, I set up the function so that each time the program comes across the current highest score in `scoreList`

, the program will append that value to `orderedList`

and remove it from `scoreList`

.

This means that when `scoreList`

is empty, the program will have checked all values and thus will return `orderedList`

.

The program also makes sure all scores given are legitimate scores by checking if they are less than or equal to the highest possible score. If a score is illegitimate, it is removed from `scoreList`

. Doing this means that if there **are** illegitimate scores, the program will have removed them from `scoreList`

before it has even started adding values to `orderedList`

.

```
maxScore = 1218000
scores = [874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400, 985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400, 1062800, 1061700, 1218000, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100]
def scoreSettler(scoreList, maximum):
orderedList = []
while len(scoreList) > 0:
for score in scoreList:
if score > maximum:
scoreList.remove(score)
elif score == max(scoreList):
orderedList.append(score)
scoreList.remove(score)
return orderedList
print scoreSettler(scores, maxScore)
```

[Challenge] Select a number, any number

**amosisa700**#24

Hello, my first challenge here with Python.

Explanation:

I iterate through the list given in first parameter and if that list have more than 0 items and those items

are lower than the max argument, then I store them into the scores list.

In the end I print the scores list starting from the last one.

Sorry for bad English.

```
scorelist = [874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400, 985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400, 1062800, 1061700, 1218000, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100]
scoremax = 1218000
def scoreSettler(list, max):
scores = []
for item in list:
if len(list) > 0 and item < max:
scores.append(item)
print scores[::-1]
scoreSettler(scorelist, scoremax)
```

**amosisa700**#25

There is also another smaller solution:

```
def scoreSettler(list, max):
scores = []
[scores.append(x) for x in list if list > 0 and x < max]
print scores[::-1]
```

**betamaster97156**#26

Fully agree with you, always feel like pointless to ask candidate to do sorting in interview. My answer is always to look it up in google. This remind me of a "new* sorting algorithm call "StackSort" from XKCD.

**betamaster97156**#28

When I am the interviewer, I never ask sorting.

As an interviewee, I never tasked to solve a sorting problem.

**oduffy**#29

As we note in our post about why we're issuing these challenges, we hope that people will be able to learn here in a totally open and accessible manner how these sorts of challenges are answered, so that they can prepare for these questions when and if they are asked. Like it or not, these sorts of questions *are* often used as a test before one can proceed further in a job interview process, and they are often asked when users are self-taught too. We'd prefer to prepare our learners for that eventuality and not hope that interviewers will buck the trend or that they will be lucky or that they should find a more "enlightened" interviewer.

**betamaster97156**#30

Understand, sorting question is simple to understand, and it is a good way to test the thinking process of a candidate.

Just that some interviewer that I know, already has a best answer in his mind, and expecting candidate to tell the answer that the interviewer wanted, not so much focus on thinking process. Well, I guess perhaps every single interview question has the same problem.

**cloudrunner15916**#31

I have reworked my submission to use my own sorting routine.

I decided to go with a Cocktail Shaker sort, a bidirectional Bubble sort.

I've been looking for an opportunity to do something using mutual recursion.

I found it quite challenging to get all the bugs out.

I guess there is a reason behind not trying to reinvent the wheel.

```
def bubble_up(a_list,l,k):
if k > 1 :
i = l
j = a_list.index(max(a_list[l:k+l]))
if i != j :
a_list[i], a_list[j] = a_list[j], a_list[i]
sink_down(a_list,l+1,k-1)
def sink_down(a_list,l,k):
if k > 1 :
i = k+l-1
j = a_list.index(min(a_list[l:k+l]))
if i != j :
a_list[i], a_list[j] = a_list[j], a_list[i]
bubble_up(a_list,l,k-1)
def shaker_sort(a_list):
bubble_up(a_list, 0, len(a_list))
return a_list
def scoreSettler(scoreList, maxScore):
return shaker_sort([score for score in scoreList if score <= maxScore])
print(scoreSettler([1, 2, 3, 999999], 1000000))
print(scoreSettler([874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400, 985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400, 1062800, 1061700, 1218000, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100], 1218000))
print(scoreSettler([1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144], 100))
```

`bubble_up`

moves larger values toward one end of the list,

while `sink_down`

moves smaller values toward the other end.

I tried using slices, but soon discovered that they were just copies

and changes to them were not showing up in the list as a whole.

So I passed around the entire list, along with a starting index and

a length, kind of a pseudo-slice.

Here is a repl.it link:

https://repl.it/JRLT/18

**shrinkhla**#32

**(Perhaps) Hard Difficulty in Java** https://repl.it/JRyQ/8

```
class Main{
public static void main(String args[])
{
int numbers[]={874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400, 985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400, 1062800, 1061700, 1218000, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100};
int max = 1218000;
//Numbers which need to be sorted
scoreSettler(numbers, max);
}
public static void scoreSettler(int[] numbers, int max){
//Sorting in descending order using merge sort
mergesort(numbers,0,numbers.length-1);
//Displaying the numbers after sorting
System.out.print("After sorting, scores are: [");
for(int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++)
{
System.out.print(numbers[i]+" ");
}
System.out.print("]");
}
static void merge(int numbers[], int low, int middle, int high)
{
// Find sizes of two subarrays to be merged
int n1 = middle - low + 1;
int n2 = high - middle;
/* Create temp arrays */
int L[] = new int [n1];
int R[] = new int [n2];
/*Copy data to temp arrays*/
for (int i=0; i<n1; ++i)
L[i] = numbers[low + i];
for (int j=0; j<n2; ++j)
R[j] = numbers[middle + 1+ j];
/* Merge the temp arrays */
// Initial indexes of first and second subarrays
int i = 0, j = 0;
// Initial index of merged subarray array
int k = low;
while (i < n1 && j < n2)
{
if (L[i] >= R[j])
{
numbers[k] = L[i];
i++;
}
else
{
numbers[k] = R[j];
j++;
}
k++;
}
/* Copy remaining elements of L[] */
while (i < n1)
{
numbers[k] = L[i];
i++;
k++;
}
/* Copy remaining elements of R[] */
while (j < n2)
{
numbers[k] = R[j];
j++;
k++;
}
}
static void mergesort(int numbers[], int low, int high)
{
if (low < high)
{
// Find the middle point
int middle = (low+high)/2;
// Sort first and second halves
mergesort(numbers, low, middle);
mergesort(numbers , middle+1, high);
// Merge the sorted halves
merge(numbers, low, middle, high);
}
}
}
```

**ajaxwhiz49308**#33

It seems like you might have forgotten about the "high_score" variable - you/re not limiting to given max score. Regards

**byteslayer90131**#34

I'm sorry, but do you mean that only scores lower than 'high_score' should be added to the final 'sorted_score_list'?

**ajaxwhiz49308**#35

Yes, at least this is how I understood this requirement. But if I was wrong then you're not using that variable anywhere, are you?

Regards

**ajaxwhiz49308**#36

Having said all that I have to admit that I like how you approached sorting - it's clean. I was just trying to wrote my own sorting and I did but mine is a bit an overkill

**ajaxwhiz49308**#37

Now, another one but with my own sorting.

The sorting function is iterating over all elements of array and comparing them: if needed elements are swapped around and this restarts the iteration over the array. This continues until all elements are in their position. The scoreSettler is only filtering sorted results to cap it to the max score.

**cloudrunner15916**#38

Since filtering is O (n) and sorting is always worse, wouldn't it make more sense to only sort after filtering.

**_sama**#40

My basic/hard difficulty challenge:

```
def scoreSettler(mylist, high_score):
#defining the function with 2 values: the list of integers and the highest score
newlist=[]
#creating an empty list. It will contain the sorted numbers.
for score in mylist:
if score>high_score:
mylist.remove(score)
#This loop will remove any score that is largest than the highest score.
while mylist!=[]:
maximum=max(mylist)
newlist.append(maximum)
mylist.remove(maximum)
#In this while statement:The maximum number in "mylist" will be found and stored in a variable, maximum.
#If maximum is lower than or equal to the highest possible score, it will be added to "newlist".
#And then, maximum will be removed from "mylist".
#This process will go on untill there is no more number in "mylist".
print(newlist)
#This print statement will print out the scores sorted.
#Because we are adding the numbers on by one in order from the highest to the lowest score, "newlist" will come out sorted.
print(scoreSettler([874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400,
985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400,
1062800, 1061700, 1218000, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100],1218000))
```

https://repl.it/JVQX/2

My code will find the maximum score from the entered list and if that score is lower than or equal to the highest possible score, it will be added to another list and removed from the first list.

This process will go on until the entered list is empty.And the second list comes out in order from the highest to the lowest score.This is the simplest and shortest solution I could find.

**aquaphoenix17**#41

There is a pretty big issue with your code. If any of the numbers in `my_list`

are greater than `high_score`

your code results in an infinite loop.

For proof, try running this:

`print(scoreSettler([874300, 879200, 1172100, 1141800, 933900, 1177200, 1190200, 1110100, 1158400, 985600, 1047200, 1049100, 1138600, 1170500, 1064500, 1190000, 1050200, 1090400, 1062800, 1061700, 1218001, 1068000, 1127700, 1144800, 1195100],1218000))`

It's basically using the test, but one of the numbers has been changed to be greater than the highest possible score. This results in an infinite loop.